If elected, what is your plan to attract new businesses to Matthews?  

Businesses thrive where talent lives, and talent chooses communities that offer a high quality of life.  Matthews already has the key ingredients: excellent schools, low crime, beautiful parks and greenways, vibrant places of worship, locally owned businesses, and quality restaurants. We’re not just a town, we are an engaged, welcoming community.

As mayor, I’ll continue working to preserve and strengthen these assets.  That means investing in education partnerships, expanding recreational opportunities, maintaining public safety, and supporting infrastructure that connects residents to jobs.  I’ll also work to ensure that Matthews remains a place where entrepreneurs and established companies alike feel confident putting down roots.

When we protect what makes Matthews special, we naturally attract the kind of businesses that share our values and want to grow with us.

How would you balance the necessary growth with maintaining some of our small-town charm?  

Preserving Matthews’ small-town charm means protecting the qualities that make us unlike any other place - a beautiful historic downtown, miles of tree-lined greenways, long-established churches and businesses, and beloved local festivals.  These are more than amenities; they are part of our identity.

With the pressures of unprecedented regional growth, maintaining that character is no small task. But our small-town feel isn’t just found in buildings or parks, it lives in the hearts of our residents.  It’s in the way neighbors greet one another from their porches, how friends acknowledge each other on the street, and the shared pride we feel in our community.

As mayor, I’ll ensure that growth is thoughtful and intentional, guided by our values, shaped by community input, and always rooted in what makes Matthews feel like home.  Our charm isn’t fragile, it’s resilient, and I’ll work every day to keep it thriving. 

How do you think Matthews can improve the availability of affordable housing?  

Since being elected Mayor in 2019, we’ve made meaningful progress in expanding affordable housing options in Matthews.  We’ve asked developers to reserve a portion of new residential projects for workforce housing thus ensuring that teachers, first responders, and other essential workers can live in the community they serve.

We have partnered with nonprofits like Habitat for Humanity not only to build new homes, but also to provide critical home repairs that help seniors age in place with dignity.  We have supported faith-based initiatives, such as Mount Moriah Missionary Baptist Church’s efforts to create standalone attainable housing units, and we have recently acquired land that could allow us to build homes for veterans alongside additional workforce housing.

These efforts reflect our values, and they will continue.  Affordable housing is not a one-time project; it’s an ongoing investment in equity, opportunity, and community stability.

What is your position and your reasoning on the possible implementation of the one cent transportation tax in Mecklenburg County?  

I do not support the one-cent transit initiative.  It would represent one of the largest tax increases in Matthews’ history, estimated at $283 per year for the median household, based on figures provided by Charlotte that I believe underestimate the true cost.

More importantly, the plan fails Matthews. Despite decades of planning and anticipation, it would not deliver light rail to our community for at least another thirty years.  That delay would cost us generations of opportunity to reap the rewards of transit-oriented development along the corridor - development that could support lower taxes, housing, jobs, and walkable infrastructure.

The referendum would also discard the $45 million already invested in the Silver Line East design and instead prioritize building light rail in Iredell County before extending it to Matthews.  While the plan may benefit other parts of the region, it does little for our residents and undermines the progress we have worked so hard to achieve.

Matthews deserves a transportation strategy that reflects our needs, respects our investments, and delivers results within a reasonable timeframe.  This referendum does none of those things. 

What are the most important efforts that Matthews is now making and should be making to protect the environment?

Protecting our environment begins with preserving the natural beauty and ecological health of Matthews for generations to come.  We’re making meaningful investments in multiuse paths, greenways, and parks, ensuring that greenspace remains accessible to residents and visitors alike.  But our commitment goes further. We’re actively pursuing initiatives that promote sustainability and environmental stewardship, including:

·     Expanding safe walking and biking infrastructure to reduce reliance on cars 

· Encouraging public transportation use as a cleaner, more efficient alternative to individual vehicle trips

·  Actively looking into installing solar-powered lighting throughout town to reduce energy consumption and promote renewable solutions

·   Enforcing construction ordinances to protect our streams from silt and runoff, preserving water quality and habitat

·  Enforcing anti-littering regulations to keep our public spaces clean and welcoming

· Supporting HAWK Certified Wildlife Communities, providing essential food, water, and shelter for local wildlife

These efforts reflect our values as a town, balancing growth with conservation, and ensuring that Matthews remains a vibrant, green, and livable community.

If elected, what is your plan to attract new businesses to Matthews?

Matthews is already a very desirable place to live, shop, and work with over 500 residents moving to Matthews each year. Matthews has an educated but aging population. Local government will need to plan, support, and assist businesses that desire to come here by not adding unnecessary regulations and delays. A continued strong collaborative partnership with the Matthews Chamber of Commerce and many other businesses is vital. Together, we can and should have a business growth plan that promotes and attracts new businesses. I purpose to champion this cause.

How would you balance the necessary growth with maintaining some of our small-town charm?

Growth in the Mecklenburg County region is inevitable. So, the question is, how do we manage growth in Matthews? Mecklenburg County currently has approximately 1.2 million citizens and is growing at a rate of nearly one thousand citizens per week. Matthews must have a clearly defined growth plan. What kind of housing products do we need to address our plan? What level of density is best for Matthews? How much growth is too much growth? As mayor, I will work closely with the town Commissioners, Town Planning, and the citizens to clarify and ensure a clear plan and direction. This growth plan will require Matthews to work closely with our neighboring towns and cities. Because the growth is regional, regional engagement is necessary. The growth of the region is impacting Matthews. Consequently, we must have a smart, clear, and decisive response before it become problematic.

How do you think Matthews can improve the availability of affordable housing?

Availability of affordable housing is an increasing challenge for most growing urban settings. There appears to be a simultaneous increased shortage and rising cost of housing. Housing supply has generally been responsive to the demand. In many urban settings, the supply does not appear to be keeping up. Home ownership is still at the center of the American dream. Governments can help by ensuring a healthy and growing economy with strong wages for workers. Homeownership will require first time home buyers to save a down payment. Incentive plans for savings will help.

What is your position, and your reasoning, on the possible implementation of the one cent transportation tax in Mecklenburg County?

The one cent increase to the Mecklenburg County sales tax from 7.25 to 8.25 is controversial and complicated. I have not conclusively decided my position for or against it. I am generally not in favor of any tax increase, especially property tax. This sales tax increase would not apply to groceries, medication, machinery, and petroleum.

Another positive is that it would bring approximately 5.4 million dollars annually for road work and repairs in Matthews. This referendum clearly benefits the greater part of Mecklenburg County than it does Matthews. Currently, the plan designates 40% of the revenue to transit, which includes bus and rail, another 40% will go to the towns for road construction and maintenance, and the remaining 20% will be allocated to the bus system. Additional details can be accessed on the Matthews website.

www.matthewsNC.gov or www.ncleg.gov/HB94

What are the most important efforts that Matthews is now making and should be making to protect the environment?

Some of the most important efforts that Matthews is making to continue to protect our environment is to enforce the many environmental codes and statutes. We currently have a very robust recycling program. Matthews has an 8% tree save for new construction. I would like to see that percentage increased and maintained. Applicants can currently pay a fee in lieu of 8%, which I am not a great fan of. Matthews has an excellent relationship with Charlotte Water; with that, we work hard to ensure proper water runoff procedures are followed. I am very encouraged in Matthews’ and Mecklenburg County’s efforts to protect the water, air, and soil of our communities. There is always room for improvement.

Three Principal Issues Facing Matthews & Proposed Solutions

1. Managing Growth While Preserving Small-Town Character

Matthews continues to experience residential and commercial growth, which brings opportunity but also pressure on infrastructure, schools, and the sense of community.

Proposed Solutions:

• Update the town’s land-use and zoning plans to ensure new development aligns with community goals.

• Encourage mixed-use and walkable developments that reduce congestion and preserve green space.

• Expand community input in the approval process so residents feel their voices are heard.

2. Transportation & Traffic Congestion

As more people move into Matthews, traffic congestion has become one of the community’s

greatest frustrations.

Proposed Solutions:

• Partner with NCDOT and neighboring municipalities to accelerate road improvements.

• Expand sidewalks, bike lanes, and greenway connections to reduce car dependency.

• Explore smart traffic technology (synchronized lights, turn-lane enhancements) to improve flow.

3. Strengthening Community Services & Quality of Life

The town must balance growth with maintaining strong public safety, parks, and recreational

services that define Matthews’ charm.

Proposed Solutions:

• Increase support for police, fire, and first responders to ensure safety keeps pace with growth.

• Invest in parks, greenways, and community programs that encourage family engagement and wellness.

• Strengthen partnerships with local businesses to build a thriving economy that benefits all residents.

What is your position and your reasoning on the possible implementation of a one cent transportation tax in Mecklenburg County?

I do not support the proposed one-cent transportation tax in Mecklenburg County. While I strongly believe in improving transit and reducing traffic congestion, this tax places an unfair burden on Matthews residents, especially working families and seniors, while providing limited and delayed benefits to our community. The Silver Line rail expansion has been downgraded, and many rail projects may not be completed for decades, leaving Matthews residents with little immediate improvement.

That said, I support practical, locally-focused transportation solutions that address current

needs without unfairly taxing residents:

• Targeted road and intersection improvements to reduce congestion in our neighborhoods.

• Expanded and improved bus service with more frequent routes and coverage where residents need it most.

• Safe pedestrian and bike infrastructure to encourage alternatives to car travel.

• Smart partnerships with state and federal programs to fund transit projects more efficiently.

In short, I oppose the one-cent tax because it is regressive, inequitable, and slow to deliver

results, but I remain committed to responsible, effective transportation solutions that benefit

Matthews residents today and in the future.

Protecting the Environment in Matthews 

Matthews has already taken positive steps to preserve our environment—such as expanding our

greenway system, maintaining tree canopy requirements, and promoting recycling and waste

reduction programs. These efforts protect our small-town feel, support public health, and make

Matthews a more livable community.

Looking ahead, we should build on this foundation by:

• Expanding Greenways and Parks: Investing in walkable, bike-friendly connections that reduce traffic while preserving open spaces.

• Protecting Tree Canopy & Natural Areas: Strengthening ordinances that protect trees and encouraging sustainable landscaping in both residential and commercial development.

• Sustainable Growth Policies: Encouraging energy-efficient building standards and responsible land use so that growth doesn’t come at the cost of our environment.

• Stormwater & Creek Protection: Continuing to improve stormwater systems to prevent flooding and protect water quality in our creeks and streams.

• Community Engagement: Partnering with schools, neighborhoods, and businesses to promote conservation and sustainability efforts.

By prioritizing these actions, Matthews can continue to grow while safeguarding the natural

beauty and resources that make our town special.

Affordable Housing in Matthews

One of Matthews’ challenges is ensuring that people who work here—teachers, first responders, young professionals, and seniors—can also afford to live here.

Matthews can increase housing affordability by encouraging “missing middle” housing—smaller-scale, multi-family units like duplexes, triplexes, and townhomes that fit within established neighborhoods. Paired with incentives for developers to include affordable units, updated zoning, and preservation of existing homes, this approach allows more residents— teachers, first responders, and young families—to live in Matthews without sacrificing the town’s character.

By taking a balanced approach, Matthews can grow responsibly while making sure our community remains welcoming and accessible to people of all ages and incomes. 

What are the 3 principal issues facing our town, and what specifically could you propose to address them?

1. Traffic

2. High Density Zoning outside the downtown

3. Tree loss

Charlotte is a destination of the vast percentage of drivers.  There is very little we can control right now of those that live in Union County and are going to work.  What we can control is placing high density developments outside the walkable, center of downtown Matthews.  You cannot complain about traffic and still approve of cramming apartment complexes or huge mixed use developments on the edges of town.  This all leads to my last point, tree loss.  If you haven't done so, I'd encourage people to drive over to Stallings rd and Idlewild Rd and look at that construction.  Developers are not saving trees like they used to.  They clear cut everything and then place back the required number of saplings and call it done.  All of those old trees are gone and no effort is made to keep them.  This is a huge problem.  I will propose we keep the high density relegated to the walkable portion of the downtown overlay and keep the outskirts to single family homes.  

What is your approach or vision for growth and development in Matthews?

I think that we should keep our high density developments located towards the center of the downtown area.  This would allow for a more walkable community and would encourage those residents to frequent the shops and restaurants in the downtown area instead of driving elsewhere.  But, outside of the downtown area, I envision a more small town suburban feel.  This would give those that would prefer a slower pace of life, a place to live.  

What is your position, and your reasoning, on the possible implementation of a one-cent transportation tax in Mecklenburg County?

Unfortunately as a non-incumbent, if I am elected, I will just be inheriting the decision.  My official vote will be, No.  I think people are struggling enough with high costs.  I know this won't affect groceries or medications, but it still doesn't seem like the right time to enact this tax.  If it passes, and I'm elected, I will work with the Commissioners and Mayor on how best to use the funds from this tax.

What are the most important efforts that Matthews is now making and should be making to protect the environment?

I think the tree save for developments is fine and I know Raleigh controls a lot of what we can do to enforce those that fail this tree save.  But I would like to see what we can do to work around and make it really difficult for developers to just say: 'whoops' and pay the fine.  I think it is vitally important to keep our healthy, old growth trees.  

How do you think Matthews can improve and increase the availability of affordable housing?

A lot of this is a national issue.  The interest rates are too high to afford a loan on a house for a first time home buyer.  As I don't see apartments as a long term living solution for a young family, I would like to see someone think outside the box on this issue.  A small development with smaller, affordable homes with restrictions for first time home buyers?  Home ownership is important for small towns.  They take pride in their homes and communities and build a healthy community.

3 Issues - Traffic, Parking, Affordability to live in Matthews. Work with DOT more closely to look for solutions to our traffic issues. Parking has never been addressed except the universal notion there is none. This has a big impact on local businesses and prospective new business. Affordability in regards to constant tax increases that strain seniors especially, yet money seems to be available for new parks, non essential projects. 

Growth in Matthews? - Stop saying yes to every developer who comes to the board with a zoning change and start managing growth more responsibly and with citizens input having importance. Progress and growth are two different things, one does not necessarily equal the other. 

One cent tax - I am against any new taxes when questions remain as to how we are spending the taxes we already have in place. This tax proposal originated in Charlotte after DOT said no to new rail lines until Charlotte improved its road infrastructure. Charlotte decided that would take too long and came up with the new sales tax that will benefit Charlotte most of all. 

What are the most important efforts that Matthews is now making and should be making to protect the environment?

Matthews needs to continue to hold developers accountable in regards to tree save, stormwater mitigation, infrastructure demands. When tree save is ignored because potential fines are built into the developers plan, thats a problem. 

How do you think Matthews can improve and increase the availability of affordable housing?

Before Matthews tries to increase affordable housing, it needs to first insure that Matthews is affordable to all current residents. There will always be those who cant afford a home, but the rising tax increases are slowly choking the finances of seniors who have lived here for years. If anyone should be helped with affordability, it is those residents who helped build Matthews over the years.  

What are the 3 principal issues facing our town, and what specifically could you

propose to address them?

·       Development, Transportation, and Safety

Promoting thoughtful growth means guiding development in a way that balances economic opportunity and development, environmental concerns, small-town community atmosphere and the capacity of our roads, water, sewer and schools. Growth must be considered in light of the impact it will have on transportation, parks, and housing. As a commissioner I will thoughtfully consider any development plan or zoning petition along with professional opinions in an effort to balance all competing concerns.

Matthews has fantastic Fire and Police Departments and we must ensure that they continue to receive the support and funding they need so they are staffed, trained, and equipped to provide the top-notch service we value.

What is your approach or vision for growth and development in Matthews?

Change and growth are inevitable but must be balanced with adequate transportation and parking, as well as preservation of our parks and green spaces and the historic and cultural character of our town. Small business growth and diverse housing options play an important role in the future success of Matthews. As Commissioner, I will thoughtfully consider developers’ plans and their impact on current and future residents to achieve that balance.

What is your position, and your reasoning, on the possible implementation of a

one-cent transportation tax in Mecklenburg County?

Matthews needs transportation solutions but Mecklenburg County’s one-cent tax is not the answer. The tax will force citizens of Matthews to pay for other towns’ light rail while providing Matthews with only a bus. I oppose the tax and I will encourage the Town’s staff to continue to work with the NC DOT to find more viable solutions that treat all towns fairly.

What are the most important efforts that Matthews is now making and should be

making to protect the environment?

Matthews’ existing parks and green spaces provide a variety of health benefits by promoting physical activity and connection to nature and provide better air and water quality. Matthews has focused on developing walkable neighborhoods and downtown, reducing vehicle emissions and can continue to protect the environment through implementing light rail, supporting sustainable development, and continuing to expand our green infrastructure.

How do you think Matthews can improve and increase the availability of

affordable housing?

By providing incentives to the owners and developers of under-utilized

commercial properties, by continuing partnerships with organizations such as Habitat for Humanity and other non-profit and community-based housing solutions, and by rezoning, the Town can create spaces that welcome residential growth.

3 issues:

Affordability - Housing affordability is paramount for anyone looking to move into Matthews. With the average price of homes rising, people are being priced out of the market. The Board needs to look earnestly at options that may be out-of-the-box and help support those who want to live in our town.

Inclusivity - Matthews needs to be inclusive of all residents, future residents, and visitors. We need to make everyone feel welcome. This will involve making strides with those outside the power structure (LGBTQ+, People of Color, Women, Disabled, and low-income residents).

Safety - Matthews has a highly rated fire department (Matthews Fire & EMS) and a reputable police department. We need to take care of them and include what we can in every budget we pass. These first responders are the heart of our town. In addition, roadway, pedestrian, and bicycle safety is a priority. While we don't have control over many roads in town, we need to make sure the ones we do have control of are as safe as they can be for those who use them.

Growth and development:

Growth in Matthews is exploding, but it is that way in all of Mecklenburg and Union Counties. We need to be intentional and thoughtful in what we approve. With the growth of housing units, the growth of businesses needs to be maintained. Ensuring that some of the businesses that open in Matthews is important. There are plans for some national businesses to come into Matthews. This is good for all!

One-cent tax:

I do not support the one-cent sales tax for the transportation bill. It does not benefit Matthews other than through a small amount of money each year. It is not enough to make impactful infrastructure upgrades. In addition, the increase in sales tax will affect the residents of Mecklenburg, including Matthews, tremendously. Coupled with the rising prices of goods, households will struggle to purchase the basics.

Affordable Housing:

The current and previous Boards have worked hard to provide affordable housing units. With Habitat for Humanity and Mount Moriah Church providing a large amount of affordable housing and working with developers to set aside units in their plans, this forward movement needs to continue.

Candidate did not respond.

Intro:

One of the things I’ve committed to during this campaign is transparency—when I receive questions from voters or groups, I share both the request and my responses here on the blog. The latest came in the form of five short but weighty questions, sent out to every candidate running for the Matthews Board of Commissioners.

The process was straightforward: voters submitted the questions, and a panel narrowed them down to the final set. Every candidate receives the same list, and the answers will be shared with the public so that Matthews residents can make informed choices at the ballot box this fall.

The catch? Each response had to be between 1,000 and 1,500 characters. That may sound like a lot until you try to explain complex issues like housing, transportation, or town finances in less than half a page. Honestly, it felt a bit like being on a candidate forum panel where you get asked a tough policy question and then handed a stopwatch with 60 seconds to sum it all up. Brevity may be the soul of wit, but in campaigns, it’s also the test of discipline.

With that said, below are the five questions I received, along with my responses. I hope they give you a clearer picture of my vision for Matthews and how I’d approach serving as your Commissioner. If you find them helpful, please share with your neighbors and start a conversation—we’ll make better decisions as a community when we talk through the issues together.

What are the 3 principal issues facing our town, and what specifically could you propose to address them?

Matthews is at a crossroads, facing challenges that are both opportunities and risks for our future. Growth, housing affordability, and fiscal stability dominate the concerns I hear from neighbors, and they are clearly reflected in the FY26 Approved Town Budget, Envision Matthews Strategic Plan, and our most recent Housing Needs Assessment.

First, growth and development must be carefully managed. Our residents want progress, but they don’t want to lose the charm that defines Matthews. The Envision Matthews plan makes this clear—walkable neighborhoods, preservation of character, and targeted redevelopment are priorities. That means updating the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), strengthening design standards, and focusing redevelopment in key corridors rather than unchecked sprawl. And while Matthews was excluded from PAVE Act funding for the Silver Line East extension, I believe we must keep pushing for inclusion so transit can be part of a balanced growth strategy.

Second, housing affordability is no longer just a future concern—it’s here now. A recent study found:

• 2,932 households (24%) are cost-burdened

• 1,252 households (13%) are severely cost-burdened

• Median home price: $505,000; average rent: $1,582

• No subsidized housing in Matthews until Mt. Moriah Church project

We must partner with nonprofits, incentivize developers to include affordable units, and redevelop aging commercial centers into mixed-use housing that serves seniors, families, and workers.

Finally, fiscal responsibility is essential. The FY26 Budget grew 8.5% to $41.3M, driven by rising personnel costs ($22.2M), debt service, and stormwater fees (up 60%). Residents deserve transparency. We should publish a clear 10-year capital improvement plan, aggressively expand grant-seeking, and implement energy savings performance contracts to modernize facilities and reduce long-term costs.

2. What is your approach or vision for growth and development in Matthews?

My vision for Matthews is growth that enhances, not erodes, the qualities that make us proud to call this town home. Growth should not mean unchecked sprawl or traffic gridlock; it should mean vibrant corridors, a walkable downtown, and neighborhoods that reflect our small-town character.

Envision Matthews provides a roadmap: redeveloping underused commercial corridors into mixed-use activity centers, expanding bike and pedestrian connectivity, and preserving existing neighborhoods. As land becomes scarce, we need to focus on infill and adaptive reuse, making sure new projects fit within the scale and design that residents expect.

Transportation is central to this vision. Nearly 13,000 residents commute out of town each day, and 71% drive alone. Expanding greenways, sidewalks, and bike lanes must go hand-in-hand with advocating for Matthews’ eventual inclusion in the Silver Line East extension. Transit is not just about mobility—it’s about attracting employers, reducing congestion, and giving families more choices.

Residents told us through the community survey that walkability, safety, and character matter most. That means bringing people into the process early. Public input must guide growth decisions, not come as an afterthought.

If we approach growth with this mindset—redevelopment first, neighborhood protection, connectivity, and transparency—we can welcome new families and businesses while keeping Matthews the place we love.

3. What is your position and your reasoning on the possible implementation of a one cent transportation tax in Mecklenburg County? 

Transportation is one of Matthews’ most pressing issues. Congestion on John Street, the need for safer intersections, and the lack of transit options affect us daily. The proposed one-percent countywide sales tax could help, but only if Matthews receives its fair share of benefits.

Too often, regional dollars flow toward Charlotte’s core, while towns like ours are left behind. If Matthews’ residents are asked to pay more, they deserve guarantees in return:

• Investment in congestion relief and road safety on key corridors.

• Expansion of sidewalks, greenways, and bike facilities called for in Envision Matthews.

• Advocacy to secure Matthews’ inclusion in the Silver Line East extension, so our residents and businesses aren’t excluded from regional transit.

Accountability is non-negotiable. We need project lists upfront, oversight that includes Matthews, and clear reporting on where every tax dollar is spent.

I approach this issue with caution. I will support transportation investment only if Matthews’ families see tangible improvements—not just promises. Transit, road safety, and everyday infrastructure must all be part of the equation.

While Matthews has long planned for the Silver Line East, the current PAVE Act excludes our town. If the referendum passes, I will work with our Mecklenburg delegation and the new Transit Authority to amend the law and secure Matthews’ share of transit revenue. We will also push for a completed value-engineering study and a realistic funding roadmap—so Matthews is not left behind in our region’s future.

4. What are the most important efforts that Matthews is now making and should be making to protect the environment? 

Matthews has taken important steps to safeguard its environment—preserving tree canopy, expanding greenways, investing in stormwater management, and adopting a Vision Zero safety plan. The FY26 budget builds on this, funding a tree assessment, heritage tree protections, and invasive plant removal. But we can and must go further.

Too often we’re shocked to see sites cleared with little regard for tree save or preservation—either because penalties are weak or oversight was left to “someone else” like the County. That can’t continue. We can’t replace 100-year-old trees. Matthews must stay directly involved, carefully vetting every project to understand its true impact on the land.

Our next phase of leadership should include:

• Stronger sustainability and stormwater standards in new development.

• Expanding green infrastructure like rain gardens, permeable pavement, and stormwater credits tied to actual cost savings.

• Electrifying the town’s vehicle fleet where practical, cutting fuel costs while reducing emissions.

• Continuing to expand parks and greenways that serve both recreation and transportation, linking neighborhoods to schools and jobs.

• Partnering regionally to advance air quality, renewable energy, and conservation goals.

The Resident Survey told us clearly: people value open space, safety, and walkability. Protecting these assets isn’t just about the environment—it’s about protecting Matthews’ character and long-term affordability.

5. How do you think Matthews can improve and increase the availability of affordable housing?

Affordable housing is one of the most difficult challenges facing Matthews. Rising home prices and rents are pushing out seniors, young families, and essential workers. Our Housing Needs Assessment paints a stark picture: nearly a third of households are cost-burdened, with median home prices over $500,000 and rents averaging more than $1,500 a month for a one bedroom apartment.

We can’t solve the housing challenge alone, but Matthews can lead locally by:

• Building Partnerships: Work with nonprofits and developers on workforce and senior housing, using tools like Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), HOME, Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) and bond funds. Our first LIHTC subsidized housing project in Matthews is Mt. Moriah Church’s 72 units

• Smart Incentives: Offer density bonuses, faster permitting, or reduced fees for projects that include affordable units.

• Reimagining Spaces: Redevelop aging commercial properties into mixed-use communities with affordable options.

• Employer Collaboration: Partner with major employers—Novant Health, CCPC, Hendrix, and others—to create workforce housing close to jobs.

• Investing in Livability: Expand greenways, parks, and walkability, while implementing “Complete Streets” for safer biking and walking.

• Preserving What We Have: Support home repair programs to help seniors age in place, expand disability housing options, and renew vacant homes for new families.

• Protecting Renters: Strengthen rental standards with inspections and a clear process for addressing unresolved issues.

• Linking Housing to Mobility: Ensure affordable housing connects to sidewalks, greenways, and future transit like the Silver Line.

If Matthews wants to stay a diverse, welcoming town, we must make sure people who work here can afford to live here. Housing isn’t just about roofs and walls—it’s about community.

Candidate did not respond.

What are the 3 principal issues facing our town, and what specifically could you propose to address them?

Public safety: Police, Fire, EMS & Public works- we need to attempt competitive pay. Negotiating the CPCC public safety training facility to be located in Matthews will give our employees the advantage of location and worldclass training.

Attainable Housing: Over 159 units of housing have been approved. Promoting the model of working with habitat for humanity & developers to provide for units for sale to habitat to operate in perpetuity will assure steady growth in attainable housing in Matthews

Traffic Congestion: need to face reality that pressure from Union County creates the problem. We need to promote better connectivity in roadway improvements and offer alternatives to navigate around Matthews. Interlocal transit opportunities would also help.

What is your approach or vision for growth and development in Matthews?

Matthews has very little developable "virgin" land available to develop, so it must make best use of filling in the blanks with missing middle residential living & more pedestrian friendly communities and less autocentric. Vision for Matthews has always been a community to Live, Work and raise a family in.

What is your position and your reasoning on the possible implementation of a one cent transportation tax in Mecklenburg County? 

I dont support the one cent sales tax because the Town will lose access to planned light rail and citizens will end up paying taxes to support other communities. second, local businesses will be hurt because we are so close to the county line.

What are the most important efforts that Matthews is now making and should be making to protect the environment? 

acquisition of park and greenspace, to defend against developers acquiring land. Improved stormwater requirements as prevention to heighten flood issues.

How do you think Matthews can improve and increase the availability of affordable housing? 

As indicated above, working with local habitat and developers to continue to provide for a % of living units to be attainable.

What are the 3 principal issues facing our town, and what specifically could you propose to address them?

We have a terrible TRAFFIC issue in town and light rail will NOT solve it with more sidewalks,bike paths solve it either but they ARE part of the solution but not 100% of the solution. When the town votes YES on high density next to two lane roads and then refuses later to widen said roads is just poor leadership. If you don't want to widen the roads stop approving high density.

We have a spending problem. Mattews has been spending at far higher rates then the past with zero guardrails and the default is . well we will just raise taxes? about three years ago the revenue neutral tax rate was increased OVER 17% ! 

We also over the last ten years have gone on a DEVELOPMENT spree with higher and higher densities . Now in a few cases it could make sense. Matthews medical center needed to expand recently as an example. But when 200 people sign a petitions and show up at meetings and the majority just don't listen? Something is wrong  with our representatives.

Matthews TAXES in just the last five years have just jumped excessive. We had a 17% plus revenue neutral property tax increase and another one but smaller will take effect this year. Huge increases like this will push are elderly people out of their homes that are on fixed incomes. Last year's COLA for Social Security was 2.5% and 2026 looks to be close to that. I have concerns with the 1 cent sales tax on the fall ballet for its regressive aspect towards the people on fixed income or the lowest income brackets. 

What is your approach or vision for growth and development in Matthews?

Matthews is a residential low density community and suburban. I lean hard on supporting that as the vision for Matthews.

What is your position and your reasoning on the possible implementation of a one cent transportation tax in Mecklenburg County? 

I have not decided yet how I will vote on this. On one hand Matthews gets a new stream of funds of 4.5 million a year for roads which is good but we will be paying via that sales tax for light rail in Charlotte that Matthews, Mint Hill and Pineville will see nothing of it.  The tax is a sales tax and as a result is a regressive tax that hits low earners harder and this concerns me. 

What are the most important efforts that Matthews is now making and should be making to protect the environment? 

Enforcing the setbacks on residential construction where all trees to adjoining properties are cleared up. Causes runoff issues , etc. We need to also end in lieu of payments that developers pay so they don't have to set aside buffer zones. The undisturbed land is worth far more than the few dollars that Matthews earns with this.

How do you think Matthews can improve and increase the availability of affordable housing?

This basic question is not for the government to decide but the market. That said you have Wall Street Equity interests purchasing residential properties in an attempt to corner the market, you also have  airbnb being set up in older neighborhoods and de facto hotels that are being set up in a home that is zoned residential. This is an issue but because the majority of authority a town has is rooted in state law. The net effect of this is to push up the rental costs in residential areas. There is a narrative that is false that if we go with very high density that costs will drop. This is false.

1. Opportunity Scholarships: Every family deserves to make their own educational choices for their children. The orignial intent was to allow families who could not afford private schools financial assistance, with the current expansion of the program, all families regardless of income can get money. This money is taken away from public schools. This hurts public education in general. My question is what is being done with the money that is left over? As a strong supporter of public schools, I want families to choose public schools so I want our state to continue funding public schools fully without taking away for those who choose private schools.

2. School Safety: We must ensure the safety of all children and staff. Every school should have a SRO and security associates, not just middle and high schools. Our students must see them as a trusted individual and that comes from daily engagement from elementary school. As safety measures evolve, we must invest in keeping our children safe.

3. Improving the Quality of education: We must continue to address reading, mathematics, and science as they are state goals, but additionally we must raise the levels of instruction and support all children to those higher levels. The 21st century learner must be able to employ all tools such as AI to be prepared for the workforce. Not all children go to college, therefore ensuring they are employed or enlisted is an important part of educational preparation. 

4. ICE has never been on CMS's school  campuses. The system has outlined safety measures and processes for law enforcement to follow which protects the students. Our Board attorneys have provided training to the principals to protect children. We must follow federal law, but we can protect the students while they are with us. 

What is your position on “opportunity scholarships?”

I believe we are obligated to provide the best possible education to our children, as our state constitution guarantees. I oppose using taxpayer education dollars for private or charter schools for several reasons:

1.     Inequitable Access: Rural communities often lack access to private or charter schools, yet state funding is reduced universally, not based on district-specific usage.

2.     Diluted Eligibility: Over 85% of program participants would not have qualified if the income requirement had not been removed.

3.     Financial Burden on Public Schools: When students return to public schools, districts cannot recover the voucher money that was paid.

How would you address school safety issues?

I am committed to prioritizing student safety, which encompasses mental health. Early identification and intervention are crucial for preventing future crises. We must guarantee that schools have adequate counseling staff. The role and time of counselors should be safeguarded so they can actively support students, families, and the teachers who work with these children daily.

Campus safety concerns vary by school, necessitating tailored solutions. I will advocate for independent development of these solutions and collaborate with County Commissioners to secure additional funding, after a thorough review of existing safety measures.

What specific proposals do you have to improve the quality of our schools?

Academic Achievement: A significant step to improving young students’ academic outcomes is to carefully review the literacy curriculum to determine if it is supported by The Science of Reading (a 185 hour reading program that all CMS elementary teachers participated in 2021 - 2022). Ensuring a strong foundation is in place will support higher learning as students progress through their educational careers.

Teacher Retention: Teacher salaries are poor across the state. The largest state increases have been targeted to beginning and new teachers, leaving experienced teachers with minimal increases over the past decade.

I will engage with County Commissioners to better compensate and retain our valuable experienced teachers by reviewing the current supplement allocation and exploring ways this allocation can be used to increase pay for experienced teachers left behind as the state increases heavily front loads the new teacher pay rate.

Investing in a stable, well-compensated teaching force provides long-term economic benefits. Collaborating locally and statewide, we can ensure experienced educators feel valued, are fairly compensated, and are empowered to shape future generations.

English Second Language Learners: For years, our ESL students have demonstrated performance gaps, signaling a need for increased support. We must evaluate existing programs and explore additional staffing to effectively address their needs while demonstrating respect for their home language.

Do you support allowing ICE to enter school property to detain or remove family members of students, given documented reports that legal immigrants and citizens have also been affected?

I am absolutely opposed to ICE on school property. However, CMS must adhere to current state law. Protocols have been implemented to guide schools when ICE is present. It is crucial that every effort is made to support impacted students (including witnesses), staff, and families through counseling services.